Salam al Rabadi : researcher and
author in international relations\ spain.
The
importance of the study of the environmental issue in international relations from casting a spotlight on
the thorny topics and problems Dealing with human life and his future in the fields of security, politics, economy, knowledge,
culture. They reflect the reality of
global variables, associated with
a range of strategic themes in terms of world politics. Including: energy and natural
resources,the effects of technological progress,limits
of military power,human rights, sustainable
development,demographic issue, food security, terrorism, ecological
political..
We have begun the
major turning point in the
consideration of environmental issues through the emergence of a substantial problems related to the development and the new context of
international relations.this problems are :
1-
What are the possibilities
and capabilities theory (philosophical) and realism,of international relations for the management
of conflict between humans and
nature?
2-
Can we say
: that international relations are no longer based on the principle of conflict of interest and not on the principle of a clash of civilizations but on the principle of struggle for survival?
3-
Is a difficult
equation in international relations are: appropriate between
the ability to improve the standard of
living and human freedom in the use of resources to meet the needs and between finding a clean environment?
4-
Are we facing a new
global patterns in international relations?
International relations were based on the nature
of the relationship between human
beings. despite the complexity of
this relationship but we can say that the level of the relationship between humans and nature may be more complex. which is essentially can not be separated about the nature of
the relations between human beings and
human beings.
This fact poses a variety of dialectics
concerning differentiation between industrialized countries and developing countries.there is the problem of priorities and then problematic
appropriate.so,
1-
is it realistic and justice to developing countries bear their responsibilities towards global environmental issues without bearing the responsibility of industrialized countries towards global environmental issues faced by the
developing countries?
2-
How can the developing
countries to be more humane
with environmental issues relating to the ozone layer and help find solutions to them. on the other
hand,no one helps developing
countries in addressing other
environmental issues,water-related: desertification and drought as a problem?
The realism also assumes require the appropriate priority between local
interests and a commitment to global
issues. it must open the way for
states to be able to implement international conventions,
according to local priorities.and
this can not happen without international assistance most
notably in terms of technology transfer.
If these facts reflect the contrast in visions and goals.is there a policy
and creative diplomacy can approach these dilemmas environmental scientific approach viable? are political
institutions and bureaucracy capable
of that? or that invisible hands
in the markets will play their own game? will the approach to environmental issues in the event of failure of processors approach to
economic policy (the
logic of the market)? are we facing a new environmental approach based on market
mechanisms in the treatment?
Clearly : show us the global changes associated with the issue of the environment
that the level of security in international relations has changed profoundly.
the issue of environmental support us package or a collection of information
and impressions that go us about the prospects for a renewed mind which will be
centered on a sense of movement to keep pace with the world and its issues
fixed and mobile . and also the image of the future will be based on a vision
of a new global patterns. At the stage of evolution .
Where it would not be feasible to rely on classic laparoscopic instruments to
read the facts in the era of post-modernism In
order to understand the framing variables and transformations in renewable
reality of international relations.
These data reflect the nature of the relationship between nature and culture which evolved according to the following:
1-
it is the era of the dominance of nature on culture, to
the era of manufacturing (the
era of the dominance of the
manufacturing culture on nature) .
2-
Here we are now in an era in which exhausted
nature and its
recovery is being artificially
under the slogan: preserving the
environment as a form of culture.
so, Does the
reality of contemporary international
relations has moved today into a new era title: from the culture and go back to the culture?????
