Salam al Rabadi ; researcher and
author in international relations \ spain.
National
independence,must remain geographically division only,not civilized
division Contains basic differences.and If there are lessons
can be learned from historical developments, in terms of the problematic relationship between religion and the state, in the forefront of
these lessons include: According to the dialectic of society and power methodological
difficulties facing anyone who
wants to address the problem of
revolutions and the interests of the
communities. Can we ask
Where the boundary in the
Arab sphere Between the interests of the authority of revolutions and between the culture and the interests of the communities?Which can be evaluated in
light of the policies of the Arab
revolutions
We must draw attention that actually we need
the fragmentation problem,This method helps us to remove the ambiguity and
confusion about this problem.Which are inherently Blurry problem is unclear.The
arguments lead us to the trade-offs and fake no point of use.All the research
and studies that focus on functional or morphological differences Between each
of these diodes do not do any good Before putting the key issue:
Is there a fundamental differences between the reality of
the authoritarian policies of the governments of revolutions? And what does not
see the structure of Arab societies In terms of the framework and cultural
climate Which determines the nature and paints those policies ?
Away from theorizing,To
illustrate this approach What we have only a study the model is very simple, reflecting
the depth of the crisis and how to address them . As those who do not see and
certainly,that is a cultural factor is the base engine and common to many
communities crises,which reflects the weak as well as the weakness of the Arab
Thought.
Although of promising revolutions in some
Arab countries,but still the structure of Arab societies suffer from dual
opposing diodes. There are also cases correspond alone inside.
And digression: Is there a theory with the exception of the cultural dimension theory can be adopted to explain the phenomenon floundering those revolutions crises that took the dimensions of economic, political and social and psychological?
The Arab reality
blatantly asserts, that the governments of revolutions crisis dimensions and
depth, are essential elements of crisis and the crisis of social relationships
at every level of society.
Everyone is
in a crisis, and the crisis in all, it is in a deep crisis and comprehensive,
extended to all levels of life, it is a structural crisis in general. It seems is to evaluate and critique of public policies,and focus on
the game of power and the opposition. But, concealer,
which does not see in those policies,is that they may be the most dangerous and
far from being only a matter of political?or social?or an issue of economic
development?but it is first and foremost, the movement of self stems from the affiliation of an ideological cultural impose its
requirements always?
The tragic reality of government policies
revolutions lies in the following question:
Why requires revolutions deal with
communities all this time and without any feasibility?
Most of
the issues raised in the literature of the thought of the revolutionary
governments. For example: power,
democracy, equality, freedom, law, ignorance, customs, traditions, the status
of women, social freedoms, economy, development, social justice, poverty,
cultural diversity, tradition, modernity, identity, the other.
All those propositions are linked in one
way or another,the basic problem is as follows:
How to control and how to work on the creation of a political system?
Therefore, a
priority to find an intellectual approach to our reality, and criticism of the
ideological and intellectual abandon consideration to the current crisis
revolutions of the traditional angles that dominate our societies, and the menu
to download the previous regimes and the interests of the major powers, all our problems.
This
revision affects all ideologies revolutions _
if they exist _ from factional to religious passing nationalism. Beginning be giving this audit priority over the other, given the
importance of awareness in the process of understanding and identifying reality
and the goals and behavior.
Consequently, this requires the use of free philosophical thought. Philosophy gives the ability to change the dire reality, a humanitarian philosophy, based on a dynamic govern itself according to the requirements of Mind and freedom.
They are on the
one hand an intellectual philosophy,Other than a specific destination is the
political philosophy. No wonder that, as in
the heart of the question of thought beating a question of politics. And philosophical thought is best placed to address the crucial
questions: identity, history and the state and power. It
is able to form a comprehensive vision of humanity and the revolution. This vision is that you need to diligence and a clear, bold and modern,
and realistic strategy options, and not merely verbal and tactical shifts,
which often ends, the moment of arrival of any revolution to power.
Also,the global transformations and social sudden. Created by the revolutions: cognitive, scientific, humanitarian, environmental, have made a break with the old
perceptions about politics and the state, society and the self and the
other.
We can say, that the questions that increase the problem complex and ambiguous, and makes the thought bewildered. are:
Why to this day is still the Arab Thought
insist thesis: Linking the subject of evolution and freedom of faith issue???
Where it is to justify underdevelopment and political decay not understand
Islam and considered social mobility humanitarian bridge just to the afterlife?
Is it permissible to continue to bet today on the restoration of the golden past, and the conviction that the past can be restored??? And likes to be restored one day?? Is it possible to evaluate the power and practice By searching for it in the world above and beyond the humanitarian human realism (post_ humanity)?
If all interpretations, of whether theological or metaphysical has failed to reach a conclusion on the subject search for sources of political power. Why cling to this thought by the Arab revolutions in the search for the source in the unseen through faith?? Or in the recent principles of human existence By Metaphysical dimensions?.
Find the right sources of political power and the exercise
Does not require any kind of faith, does not require jumping over the human
world. In the world of political rights there is no higher authority one ,
comprehensive , gives rise to various authorities Or subject them tightly fully.
The oneness of power in society , perception is consistent with the
philosophy of control, not with the philosophy of power. If we can see authoritarian policies revolutions: of
confusion and corruption, and
the rape of power. But, what does not see is that all of these policies reflect
and express the reality of our society: metaphysician divine,Monopolist truth?
If the Arabs want to stand up and come forward,they should at first torpedo Arab presence traditional. For two reasons:
Firstly,because that presence. The
existence of contradictory patient. It is most dangerous to our future .
Second,his
claim that society: theological,perfect,full options. This means,we can not make the conversion or change it.
In short, this is an intellectual problem at hand now with regard
to the development of new constitutions of revolutions.It will become of these
constitutions, the closest thing to a symbolic order,is intended to emphasize
the identity, and this kind of attitude identity.
The identity of the position, no less important than the identity of
the self, in the communities is confident of themselves culturally. In a world
where we have control and superiority to others. Declaration ,for example in
the constitutions of those revolutions and the Arab societies that Islam is the
state religion.It is a matter of the identity of the situation does not make
sense, except in the case of Avatar significance. Religion is a set of ideas
and the provisions of the standard and the types of worship which is attributed
to the individual only no one can that is worship only human. While states They
are legal entities .
But here's the basis of this fact,we are entitled to inquire about the question of discursive
How is the state religion?? It is a personal moral
Consequently,those
rules _and constitutions that do not distinguish between the mundane and the
metaphysical things_ will form the future: The power of symbolism and inflict
violence symbolic. The grounds that they reflect the will of God on earth, and may not be for one manipulate
them.
If we, the expansion of
the political approach of modernity and its requirements to include some different subjects, especially theological thought and issued him a religious culture. Then our existence becomes more rational. Thus, we can start to build a better future, based on the vision of a new intellectual. Vision calls for respect for each other do not share my same opinion.
The other is the
one who constantly makes us remember that we do not have the whole truth. It claims to
possess himself was sentenced to stay away from her. We must hope
also be nostalgia for a golden age this time, the following is the future and
not the past that has elapsed. The answer is the old to the new questions are no longer sufficient. The historical
trend of the path of the Arab presence, can not only be towards modernity.
The presence of this will be able to stand on his feet, after a long stop on the head?? If true, this definition of ideology :” As an inverted consciousness, standing on his head”?
Finally, it may be impossible for those revolutions change the
Arab societies toward the future, as long as all you see is to look at
governance policies and authoritarianism? Clerics thinkers sitting in hotels sex and the destruction of the Sphinx? And beheadings by the sword at the hands of children? And approval to kill
7 million people out of 20 million disagree with them belief?
Since the theorists of revolutions and its
officials and financiers are present in the palaces and media channels to
governments far cry from the freedom and democracy and are expelled every media
said the position of outside leaked?
And foreclosed on the revolutions that are
approaching them? But more than that, a high incidence of laws to prevent
and prohibit demonstrations, even if in order to provide advice or say a word
of truth in the face of unjust authority??
