2014-06-04

America and China Between The Era of Non-Polar and Strategic Impossible





Salam al Rabadi : researcher and author in international relations\ spain


There are a lot of problems which relate to the global system which requires trying to read the future from different angles to the identity of this system and the main actors in it. And in the midst of this fact the term comes the era of non-polar expression of the world moves from a unipolar system to a system in which the polar non-existent in its various forms or become meaningless whoever unipolar or bipolar or multipolar. therefore because of the quality of many factors: cultural, economic, political….



These factors have become a feature of our time and will remain for quite a few years. In fact some of them it is today the most important determinants of many global and regional affairs and even local. The entry of the era of information network which generates interdependence of cross-border political and geographical. Also the existence of global networks of interactive between the institutions of global civil society and the rapid ascent of the role of individuals. Therefore that global variables realism and intellectual and philosophical approaches in light of the so-called era of globalization it is impossible to make a strategic talk about the system _ international or global _ controlled by one pole or multiple poles disputing power around the world.



According to the theory of realism and read through the global history of great powers , must foretelling the end of the unipolar and the search for the great powers at the level of the new states. But, there are some problems, and complexities raised the level of difficulty of predicting trends in the evolution of the global system, and that makes future scenarios scientific daunting task because these phenomena are still in the process of forming and configuration.



In spite of trying a lot of elites , look for ways to support the United States of America site in the emerging global reality for fear of getting caught in a vacuum or in order to prevent chaos. And that the United States can continue to practice the role of the polar world in spite of the fall from unipolar site which dates back to the emergence of new powers on the world stage rather than due to the weakness of military or political weakness  or both. 



Since the transfer of power and the change in the balance of power is Non Zero-Samgame results. In other words, to increase the influence and authority and power of a state, does not necessarily mean, the loss of other major countries to control global influence.



In all cases, we ask questions, the following strategy:


Surprisingly, How the American influence was the fact realism but did not continue or settle for more than 15 or 20 years?????


Can we say through timescale or historical logic: that this time period is just a moment. Therefore we can not build on it?????
Seems to be no escape from the conclusion based on the historical record, that the long-term relative decline of U.S. power continues until this moment. Based on this, now the question becomes logical and strategic in the range of scientific and academic research, is:


Not whether China will become a global superpower but when will it happen?????



Finally, there are many fundamental questions, which operates the thinking elites throughout the world, in the areas of political, economy, culture and the environment, which is trying to explore the future of the world. It is fun questions, carrying with it all the fun of additional new when we try to read the political future of our world.


But the problem remains essentially based on whether anyone can predict the future of the current powers of the world?




For communication and cooperation

يمكن التواصل والتعاون مع الباحث والمؤلف سلام الربضي عبر الايميل
jordani_alrabadi@hotmail.com